Node
In BrainyFlow, a Node is the fundamental building block of any application. It represents a discrete, self-contained unit of work within a larger flow. Nodes are designed to be reusable, testable, and fault-tolerant.
Node Lifecycle

Every node follows a clear, three-phase lifecycle when executed: prep
→ exec
→ post
. This separation of concerns ensures clean data handling, computation, and state management.
prep(memory)
:Purpose: Prepare the node for execution. This is where the node reads necessary input data from the
Memory
object (which includes both global and local state).Output: Returns a
prep_res
(preparation result) that will be passed directly to theexec
method. This ensuresexec
is pure and doesn't directly access shared memory.Best Practice: Keep
prep
focused on data retrieval and initial validation. Avoid heavy computation or side effects here.
exec(prep_res)
:Purpose: Execute the core business logic or computation of the node. This method receives only the
prep_res
from theprep
method.Output: Returns an
exec_res
(execution result) that will be passed to thepost
method.Key Principle:
exec
should be a pure function (or as close as possible). It should not directly access theMemory
object or perform side effects. This makesexec
highly testable and retryable.Fault Tolerance: This is the phase where retries are applied if configured.
post(memory, prep_res, exec_res)
:Purpose: Post-process the results of
exec
, update theMemory
object, and determine the next steps in the flow.Input: Receives the
Memory
object,prep_res
, andexec_res
.Key Actions:
Write results back to the global
Memory
store.Call
self.trigger("action_name", forking_data={...})
(Python) orthis.trigger("action_name", {...})
(TypeScript) to specify which action was completed and pass any branch-specific data to the local store of successor nodes.A node can trigger multiple actions, leading to parallel execution if the flow is a
ParallelFlow
.
Creating Custom Nodes
To create a custom node, extend the Node
class and implement the lifecycle methods:
from brainyflow import Node, Memory
class TextProcessorNode(Node):
async def prep(self, memory) -> str:
# Read input data
return memory.text
async def exec(self, text: str) -> str:
# Process the text
return text.upper()
async def post(self, memory, input_text: str, result: str):
# Store the result in the global store
memory.processed_text = result
# Trigger the default next node (optional)
self.trigger('default')
All step definitions are optional. For example, you can implement only prep
and post
if you just need to alter data without external computation, or skip post
if the node does not write any data to memory.
Error Handling
Nodes include built-in retry capabilities for handling transient failures in exec()
calls.
You can configure retries with 2 options in their constructor to control their behavior:
id
(string, optional): A unique identifier for the node. If not provided, a UUID is generated.maxRetries
(number): Maximum number of attempts forexec()
(default: 1, meaning no retry).wait
(number): Seconds to wait between retry attempts (default: 0). Thewait
parameter is especially helpful when you encounter rate-limits or quota errors from your LLM provider and need to back off.
During retries, you can access the current retry count (0-based) via self.cur_retry
(Python) or this.curRetry
(TypeScript).
To handle failures gracefully after all retry attempts for exec()
are exhausted, override the execFallback
method.
By default, execFallback
just re-raises the exception. You can override it to return a fallback result instead, which becomes the exec_res
passed to post()
, allowing the flow to potentially continue.
The error
object passed to execFallback
will be an instance of NodeError
and will include a retryCount
property indicating the number of retries performed.
from brainyflow import Node, NodeError, Flow
class CustomErrorHandlingNode(Node):
async def exec(self, prep_res):
print(f"Exec attempt: {self.cur_retry + 1}")
if self.cur_retry < 2: # Fail for first 2 attempts
raise ValueError("Simulated exec failure")
return "Successful result on retry"
async def exec_fallback(self, prep_res, error: NodeError) -> str:
# This is called only if exec fails on the last attempt
print(f"Exec failed after {error.retry_count + 1} attempts: {error}")
# Return a fallback value instead of re-raising the error
return f"Fallback response due to repeated errors: {error}"
async def post(self, memory, prep_res, exec_res: str):
# exec_res will be "Success on retry" or "Fallback response..."
print(f"Post: Received result '{exec_res}'")
memory.final_result = exec_res
print(f"Post: Final result is '{exec_res}'")
# Example usage
node = CustomErrorHandlingNode(max_retries=3, wait=5) # Will retry twice, then fallback
flow = Flow(start=node)
await flow.run({})
Node Transitions
Nodes define how the flow progresses by triggering actions. These actions are then used by the Flow
to determine the next node(s) to execute.
self.trigger(action_name: str, forking_data: Optional[SharedStore] = None) -> None
Call this method within the
post
method of your node.action_name
: A string identifying the action that just completed (e.g.,"success"
,"error"
,"data_ready"
). This name corresponds to the transitions defined in theFlow
(e.g.,node.on('action_name', nextNode)
).forking_data
(optional): A dictionary (Python) or object (TypeScript) whose key-value pairs will be deeply cloned and merged into the local store (memory.local
) of the memory instance passed to the next node(s) triggered by this action. This allows for passing specific data down a particular branch without polluting the global store.A node can call
trigger
multiple times in itspost
method, leading to multiple successor branches being executed (sequentially inFlow
, concurrently inParallelFlow
).
trigger()
can only be called inside the post()
method. Calling it elsewhere will result in errors.
The running Flow uses the action_name
triggered to look up the successor nodes, which are defined using .on()
or .next()
(as seen in the next section below).
Defining Connections (on
, next
)
on
, next
)While trigger
determines which path to take during execution, you define the possible paths before execution, by using either .next()
or .on()
, as shown below:
You can define transitions with syntax sugar:
Basic default transition:
node_a >> node_b
This means ifnode_a
triggers the default action, go tonode_b
.Named action transition:
node_a - "action_name" >> node_b
This means ifnode_a
triggers"action_name"
, go tonode_b
.
Note that node_a >> node_b
is equivalent to node_a - "default" >> node_b
# Basic default transition
node_a >> node_b # If node_a triggers "default", go to node_b
# Named action transitions
node_a - "success" >> node_b # If node_a triggers "success", go to node_b
node_a - "error" >> node_c # If node_a triggers "error", go to node_c
To summarize it:
node.on(actionName, successorNode)
: ConnectssuccessorNode
to be executed whennode
triggersactionName
.node.next(successorNode, actionName = DEFAULT_ACTION)
: A convenience method, equivalent tonode.on(actionName, successorNode)
.
These methods are typically called when constructing your Flow
. See the Flow documentation for detailed examples of graph construction.
Example: Conditional Branching
A common pattern is a "router" node that determines the next step based on some condition (e.g., language detection, data validation result).
import asyncio
from brainyflow import Flow, Node, DEFAULT_ACTION
async def detect_language(content: str) -> str:
if "hello" in content.lower(): return "english"
if "hola" in content.lower(): return "spanish"
return "unknown"
class RouterNode(Node):
async def prep(self, memory):
return memory.content
async def exec(self, content: str):
return await detect_language(content)
async def post(self, memory, prep_res: str, exec_res: str):
print(f"RouterPost: Detected language '{exec_res}', storing and triggering.")
memory.language = exec_res # Store language in global memory
# Trigger the specific action based on the detected language
self.trigger(exec_res) # e.g., trigger 'english' or 'spanish' or 'unknown'
# Assuming EnglishProcessorNode, SpanishProcessorNode, UnknownProcessorNode are defined elsewhere
# --- Flow Definition ---
router = RouterNode()
english_processor = EnglishProcessorNode()
spanish_processor = SpanishProcessorNode()
unknown_processor = UnknownProcessorNode()
# Define connections for specific actions using syntax sugar
router - "english" >> english_processor
router - "spanish" >> spanish_processor
router - "unknown" >> unknown_processor # Add path for unknown
flow = Flow(start=router)
async def run_flow():
memory_en = {"content": "Hello world"}
await flow.run(memory_en)
print("--- English Flow Done ---", memory_en)
memory_es = {"content": "Hola mundo"}
await flow.run(memory_es)
print("--- Spanish Flow Done ---", memory_es)
memory_unk = {"content": "Bonjour le monde"}
await flow.run(memory_unk)
print("--- Unknown Flow Done ---", memory_unk)
asyncio.run(run_flow())
Example: Multiple Triggers (Fan-Out / Batch Processing)
A single node can call this.trigger()
multiple times within its post
method to initiate multiple downstream paths simultaneously. Each triggered path receives its own cloned memory
instance, potentially populated with unique local
data via the forkingData
argument.
This "fan-out" capability is the core pattern used for batch processing (processing multiple items, often in parallel).
For a detailed explanation and examples of implementing batch processing using this fan-out pattern with Flow
or ParallelFlow
, please see the Flow documentation.
Running Individual Nodes
Nodes have a run(memory, propagate?)
method, which executes its full lifecycle (prep
-> execRunner
(which handles exec
and execFallback
) -> post
). This method is primarily intended for testing or debugging individual nodes in isolation, and in production code you should always use Flow.run(memory)
instead.
Do NOT use node.run()
to execute a workflow.
node.run()
executes only the single node it's called on. It does not look up or execute any successor nodes defined via .on()
or .next()
.
Always use Flow.run(memory)
or ParallelFlow.run(memory)
to execute a complete graph workflow. Using node.run()
directly will lead to incomplete execution if you expect the flow to continue.
The node.run()
method can, however, return information about triggered actions if the propagate
argument is set to true
. This is used internally by the Flow
execution mechanism.
// Run with propagate: false (default) - returns ExecResult
async node.run(memory: Memory | GlobalStore, propagate?: false): Promise<ExecResult>
// Run with propagate: true - returns triggers for Flow execution
async node.run(memory: Memory | GlobalStore, propagate: true): Promise<List<Tuple<Action, Memory>>>
Best Practices
Single Responsibility: Each node should do one thing well. Avoid at all costs monolithic nodes that handle too many responsibilities!
Pure
exec
: Keep theexec
method free of side effects and direct memory access. All inputs should come fromprep_res
, and all outputs should go toexec_res
.Clear
prep
andpost
: Useprep
for input gathering andpost
for output handling and triggering.Respect the lifecycle: Read in
prep
, compute inexec
, write and trigger inpost
. No exceptions allowed!Use
forkingData
: Pass branch-specific data viatrigger
'sforkingData
argument to populate thelocal
store for successors, keeping the global store clean.Type Safety: For better developer experience, define the expected structure of
memory
stores, actions, and results.Error Handling: Leverage the built-in retry logic (
maxRetries
,wait
) andexecFallback
for resilience.
Last updated